Contextual
Resources

Once a government or tech company develops a definition of terrorism or violent extremism, it can be difficult to know how to apply these definitions to the variety of ways that terrorism and violent extremism manifests internationally and across online spaces.

This section of the site aims to highlight contextual resources on themes related to applying definitions to the online space.  GIFCT funds the Global Network on Extremism and Technology (GNET) to bring forward actionable insights from experts and practitioners around the world to better inform and give context to tech companies, governments, practitioners and other stakeholders in this field. Insights are curated here under context-based themes.

Filters

Regional Trends

While experts can point to overarching global trends in terrorism and violent extremism, we also know that there are significant regional and country-based variables in how these groups recruit, mobilize, propagandize, and coordinate attacks. There are also varying international trends in the types of platforms terrorists and violent extremists use in different parts of the world, their overarching aims and the ways their aims manifest online. GNET includes expert insights from academics and practitioners all over the world, feeding in the nuances and adversarial shifts they report on.

APAC

Throughout the APAC region, insights aid in contextualizing violent extremism online in both regional and country specific ways. Relevant research presents useful explorations of right-wing extremist activity and ideologies in Southeast Asia, and the applicability and adaptability of tech policies across the global south. Additionally, there has been a focus in the research on country specific groups, such as the latest shifts around cyber-enabled extremism in Australia, the potential online extremist propaganda challenges for Indian emerging tech platforms, or recent online deradicalization efforts in Indonesia.

Far-Right

Insights can aid in contextualizing the overall ideology and diversity of groups implied by the term “Far-Right”. Relevant research focusing on the Far-Right and White Supremacy present useful explorations of how groups have attempted to exploit and sometimes been deplatformed by platforms, along with wider exposés on global online far right activity. Additionally, available research hones in on particular groups such as QAnon, the Proud Boys, amongst others.

  • 11th January 2021
    From #ArsonEmergency to #DanLiedPeopleDied: How Extremist Messaging Co-Opts Emergency Events on the Australian Twittersphere
    Dr. Timothy Graham
  • 26th November 2020
    Now Streaming: “Love Jihad” on Netflix
    Dr. Eviane Leidig
  • 22nd October 2020
    Hindutva Vigilantism: Online Hate, Offline Harms
    Nazneen Mohsina
  • 07th October 2020
    A Comparison of Australian and Canadian Right-Wing Extremist Facebook Group Pages
    Jade Hutchinson
  • 25th September 2020
    Geographically Contextualising Right-Wing Extremism for Tech Platforms: A Perspective From India
    Kabir Taneja , Maya Mirchandani
  • 24th September 2020
    Increased Visibility of Far-Right Movements in Australia During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Samaya Borom
  • 15th April 2020
    “#CoronaJihad”: How the Far-Right in India is Responding to the Pandemic
    Dr. Eviane Leidig
  • 24th February 2020
    Far-Right Terrorism is Global, but Coverage is Not: Hindu Nationalist Violence in India
    Dr. Eviane Leidig

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. See our privacy policy.